USW

Statistics

The state of the benchmark

A live cross-section of the University of Scientific Workflow corpus — domains, difficulty, tools, environments, and workflow shape. Read it to find the gaps: the thin domains and missing difficulty tiers are exactly where your lab's next contribution counts most.

18 tasks indexedUpdated continuously Fill a gap
18
Verified tasks
across 10 active domains
10 / 10
Domains covered
0 still empty
25
Simulations
top: ESM3
30
Workflow steps
atomic, verifiable
53
Target metrics
scientist-set thresholds
1
Expert-verified
18 contributing authors

Tasks per domain

Where the corpus is deep — and where it is thin. Faded bars are domains with zero tasks.

Full coverage

Difficulty distribution

Balance across Easy → Expert tiers.

18tasks
  • Easy00%
  • Medium739%
  • Hard739%
  • Expert422%

Review status

Verified vs. in-flight contributions.

18tasks
  • Verified16%
  • Under review16%
  • Seed / sample1689%

Corpus growth

Cumulative task total, with newly registered tasks per month.

Most-used simulations

How many tasks reference each tool or solver.

Execution environments

Where the referenced tools run.

31refs
  • HPC1445%
  • Terminal1135%
  • VM (GUI)310%
  • Web API310%

Coverage shape

Task count per domain, as a coverage footprint.

Average workflow length

Mean number of atomic steps per task, by domain.

Domain × difficulty coverage

Every empty cell is an uncollected slice — pick one for your next submission.

Domain
Easy
Medium
Hard
Expert
Protein Engineering
·
·
1
1
Genomics
·
2
·
·
Structural Biology
·
1
·
1
Computational Chemistry
·
·
2
·
Materials Science
·
·
1
1
Drug Discovery
·
1
1
·
Neuroscience
·
1
·
·
Systems & Synthetic Biology
·
1
1
·
Climate & Earth Science
·
·
1
·
Astrophysics
·
1
·
1
Fewer
More tasksNo coverage yet — a gap to fill

Spotted a gap?

Several difficulty tiers within covered domains still sit empty. Bring the workflow behind your Nature-family paper to the benchmark — after expert review it becomes a task here.